Monday, August 20, 2007

12 angry men

i think it's interesting that so many people in this movie seem to be able to blindly believe the worst of the defendant just because of some shaky evidence. any reasonable doubt is enough to acquit him...and from the evaluation of evidence that the main guy provided, there's some significant doubt in my mind at least. what this movie is trying to show, i think, is that even though the "system" is supposed to fair to everyone and consider all aspects of a trial, human prejudice is unavoidable. i guess i'm trying to say that no matter how allegedly foolproof the system is, because it's run by people it can't really be perfect.

No comments: