Congratulations to those who are getting signed up on the blog! Now, let us hear from you!
I have seen some great comments and questions so far regarding the movie. Let me ask a few more...
Why is prejudice not a good way of knowing in this instance? Can prejudice ever be a useful way of knowing?
What role has personal experience played in the knowledge of the jurors? When has personal experience proved to be a faulty way of knowing and when has it proved beneficial?
Do you think the gentleman who originally voted "not guilty" proved, to your satisfaction, that there is reasonable doubt in this case? Why or why not?
Sunday, August 19, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment