i believe that this movie displays how our judicial system SHOULD work today. That one man can overcome the prejudices of other jury members and convince them otherwise. The case obviously had enough evidence not to convict the kid because of reasonable doubt. In a criminal case the prosecutor MUST have a good enough arguement coupled with evidence and facts to CLEARLY show that the accused is guilty....that didnt happen here.
This movie also displays peoples preconceived ideas about the accused...even when he faces going to the chair! Some jury members believed that because of the kids background, his neighborhood, his past, and the stereotypes of ruffians, that he DEFINITLY killed his father, without even hearing the evidence they assumed he was guitly. In my opinion the 12 jury members represent the question, are your beliefs chosen? Either a belief can be automatic (the 1st guy to vote not guilty) or some choose not to believe because they dont want to believe (the other jury members).....o and by the way, this is victor
Monday, August 20, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment